Timeline for Making Questions Randomly Active (Feature Request)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://tex.stackexchange.com/ with https://tex.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 3, 2015 at 9:35 | vote | accept | Steven B. Segletes | ||
| Jul 31, 2015 at 8:39 | comment | added | Thomas Orozco StaffMod | I think the goal of surfacing good content is a valuable one (and I'm working on some ideas around this, though they're about curation by actual humans). However, I'm not sure that bumping random content is the right way to approach this. I'm also concerned it wouldn't work too well on bigger sites. Now, please feel free to suggest this on the main meta if you feel strongly about it, maybe it'll get good reception or maybe alternative ideas. | |
| Jul 30, 2015 at 22:48 | answer | added | percusse | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 30, 2015 at 22:39 | comment | added | percusse | @AndrewCashner Bot does it when there is no upvoted answer (accepted but not upvoted answers are also counted as unanswered). I think Steven wants also the highly voted questions as given in his question. | |
| Jul 30, 2015 at 17:46 | comment | added | musarithmia | Doesn't the "Community" user (i.e., bot) do this already? | |
| Jul 30, 2015 at 17:22 | history | asked | Steven B. Segletes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |