Timeline for What to do with the solved questions concerning a mistake not linked to the question?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://tex.stackexchange.com/ with https://tex.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 27, 2013 at 5:32 | vote | accept | Ludovic C. | ||
| Aug 27, 2013 at 0:00 | answer | added | texenthusiast | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 21, 2013 at 20:22 | comment | added | barbara beeton | quite a few such questions have been closed as "off topic" or "out of scope" (or whatever the currently acceptable reason is). another question (which i haven't tried to find because i'm limited on time) suggested giving a quick answer, to be polite as well as to provide definitive closure, then making a comment giving the reason for closure, and voting for closure. the panel shown when "out of scope" is chosen now provides a space to fill in a custom reason. | |
| Aug 21, 2013 at 20:18 | comment | added | texenthusiast |
Good to know you are working hard to reduce the number of unanswered Q, Two Options: 1. comment to @egreg to convert his comments to answer ( which has nice explanation of why the error was not "amsmath not found") 2. Directly make an answer from egreg's comments ( I know egreg does not worry too much in doing so). I am pretty sure with egreg's explanatory comment on cases error info, it becomes a deserving an answer even though it's a small missing package issue. Basically adding value for the answer.
|
|
| Aug 21, 2013 at 19:46 | history | asked | Ludovic C. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |