Timeline for LaTeX editing discussions that are editor specific
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2010 at 17:02 | comment | added | SamB | @ShreevatsaR: Of course, that would assume that the question was not about the same editor. In any case, I'll keep this in mind before I post any answers involving acme(1) or sam(1). (Of course, I'd also have to learn Plan9...) | |
| Jul 27, 2010 at 1:50 | vote | accept | Suresh | ||
| Jul 27, 2010 at 1:41 | comment | added | ShreevatsaR | Yes, as long as it's useful to someone, answers are ok. An answer about an obscure editor that is useful to fewer people will probably get fewer upvotes, but that's the way the system is intended to work. | |
| Jul 27, 2010 at 1:38 | history | answered | David Z | CC BY-SA 2.5 |