Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
The question you're asking is designed to solicit opinions or best-practices on a particular topic, with the goal of reaching community consensus.
16
votes
6
answers
461
views
Should we mark historic questions somehow?
The TeX packages have developed a lot since the first questions were asked on sx. Many high voted questions from 2011 do not reflect the situation today.
The users who asked and answered the question …
5
votes
Should we mark historic questions somehow?
We could add the year when the question was asked to the title like "How to ... in 2011"
this leaves the old question in a good state
we can open a new question "How to ... in 2019" on demand and li …
6
votes
How to encourage people to send bug reports instead of using SX as kind of bugtracker, or at...
First the user has to find out, if it is only the own system, or a package bug. It is not trivial to test TeX packages:
Test routines are often missing.
Most TeX users have no clue about packages a …
4
votes
1
answer
159
views
Merge {hyperlink} and {links}
I suggest to merge the tags hyperlink andlinks. They mean the same here.
The Oxford dictionary reports:
1.5 short for hyperlink
Update:
There is also a similar tag cross-referencing. Should we …