Hot answers tagged

30

I'm in support: a lot of visitors to TeX.SX don't speak English very well, and this makes the post's intent clearer; I also don't see a downside. One thing which influenced my decision was that if one searches for the phrase "for idiots", the only results are "BibLaTeX for Idiots" and several links to it. If there were several such posts, perhaps the ...


16

In the very least, include a reference to the "for Dummies" series to clarify its usage. Perhaps even including an image to highlight it visually... in the spirit of being original, I mocked this up from a German version: Regardless, I support the change. I think Biblatex for beginners sounds more generic, as there's probably little difference between ...


15

5 years of display and 200 votes are not good enough evidence that it is not offensive because people probably identify this as a self-deprecation of the OP? And from the homepage of the user, I'm sure he is aware of what idiot means. Finally, notice that all the edits were concerned about how to spell biblatex instead of the idiots parts which was (and ...


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible