Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with discussion
Search options not deleted
user 177
The question you're asking is designed to solicit opinions or best-practices on a particular topic, with the goal of reaching community consensus.
15
votes
1
answer
286
views
Is it OK to propose package modifications or improvements?
The title says it all: I wanted to share my desire to see one day the features of cleveref and varioref all in one package.
However, this is not a real question. Is it OK to post it on TeX.SE?
Or -b …
- 7,193
6
votes
1
answer
259
views
RTFM, but for the log file
How about a polite way to invite to take a deeper look at the .log file?
This is meant for a contribution to be added to Text building blocks.
It is agreed that to RTFL someone in the answer is inap …
- 7,193
3
votes
Text building blocks
I didn't find a snippet about links pointing to external pages instead of providing a MWE embedded in the question.
Links pointing to dropbox/overleaf/bitbuckets can become invalid.
Please add a mean …