Don't miss the article. No MWE for this one.

  • 8
    I believe the chat is a better place to share such information with the community, and, in fact. it has been shared there. – user121799 Dec 18 '18 at 5:06
  • Indeed. I rarely chat. – Reinhard Neuwirth Dec 18 '18 at 6:33
  • 4
    @marmot but in chat it soon disappers from view. I think here is better for historical reason, even if it is off-topic. – CarLaTeX Dec 18 '18 at 11:49
  • @CarLaTeX Originally it was on the main site. On this site it makes more sense, I agree. – user121799 Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
  • @marmot Yay, great article! – CarLaTeX Dec 18 '18 at 11:54
  • 1
    @marmot It might make more sense on the main site. The question is related to tex and not to the software that powers tex.se (which is the topic of tex.meta) – samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz Dec 18 '18 at 12:06
  • @samcarter My thinking is that this is not a question that can be answered (in the usual sense), and on meta it is possible to have a discussion. – user121799 Dec 18 '18 at 12:08
  • @marmot Discussion can happen on meta, but the discussion should be about "the workings and policies of TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange rather than discussing TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems itself." (tex.stackexchange.com/help/whats-meta) Maybe the question just does not fit in the stackexchange framework (It would be well suited for one of the tex mailing list, or texblog.net) – samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz Dec 18 '18 at 12:11
  • @samcarter Yes, that's why I suggested the chat. – user121799 Dec 18 '18 at 12:13
  • @marmot Ah yes, that is a good advice :) – samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz Dec 18 '18 at 12:14
  • Thank you for pointing out this article, which I will read religiously, hoping (but not believing) that he will have been asked what his purpose was when he allowed the tokens to be modified :-) – AndréC Dec 19 '18 at 5:08
  • 4
    Once upon a time we had a blog... – Martin Schröder Dec 19 '18 at 8:27
  • 1
    “It started out that computer scientists were worried nobody was listening to us. Now I’m worried that too many people are listening.” — That closing statement is pretty spot on, and shows infinitely more self-consciousness than most tech gurus. – gnucchi Dec 27 '18 at 18:45

Yes, we are all reading

enter image description here

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .