A few days ago a new user answered How to set document font to times new roman by command. This answer basically is the same as the accepted answer, just recommending an outdated package (according to l2tabu
) and not answering the 14pt chapter heading requirement at all. Another user commented it would be a good first post.
To me it seemed that similar to the accepted answer that I thought it would be more of a comment on the accepted answer, because the only noticeable difference (to me) was another package recommendation. Thus I flagged it as "Not an answer", which was "disputed":
Question: If an answer seems to duplicate the accepted answer (and maybe doesn't even fully answer the question) should I flag or downvote it?
I've used the search on Meta to find some previous questions, but I'm not sure any of the answers I found (which are also in the related links section on the right) answers my question.
Looks Ok
are hidden and most times not really comprehensible. I have the impression that many 'disputed flags' should have been not disputed.