biblatex is the modern tool for bibliography creation you really might want to use when writing your thesis. You can quite easily change the appearance of your bibliography; you can change the punctuation between fields, you can change the format of a field, you can change the order of the fields.
You can even define completely new fields and entry types, making it possible to handle a database of different addresses for serial letter creation.

Many question on site deal with at least one change of the above mentioned list. So far all those questions are tagged {biblatex}. This makes it a bit hard for helpers as well as starters to find some relevant information that could have been categorized.

Do you think that a few additional tags are useful to better find similar questions and answers?
Tags i could think of would be (for example) called {biblatex-punct}, {biblatex-format}, or {biblatex-order} (not to confuse with sort).

| |
  • 6
    I wonder if such sub-tags might be for bibliographies in general. Things like 'ordering', 'punctuation' are common BibTeX problems as well as biblatex ones. – Joseph Wright May 25 '16 at 17:24
  • @JosephWright Fair point. – Johannes_B May 25 '16 at 17:25
  • 3
    I think this is a good idea, but the tags should be very carefully named, which is a lot harder than it seems. Also, abbreviations in tags isn't so helpful (punct vs. punctuation) They will automatically show up when people start typing them so explicit ones are better I think. – Alan Munn May 25 '16 at 17:31
  • Also, one thing that can help tagging more generally is putting proper sub-tag suggestions with the main tag descriptions. – Alan Munn May 25 '16 at 17:32
  • 2
    I think tagging itself is a hard task and only experienced users are likely to get it right. Retagging is done often on TeX.SX to better categorize a question. I think, you cannot blame a starter for not correcctly tagging due to a lack of knowledge. – Johannes_B May 25 '16 at 17:48
  • 4
    I agree and I'm not blaming anyone, but I think we can do more to help make tags clear to people. That's my only point. – Alan Munn May 25 '16 at 18:10
  • 1
    @Johannes_B Some of the tags aren't clear to me even now and even though I stop to read their descriptions. I still end up guessing arbitrarily some of the time. So I do think there are issues generally with the tagging. It isn't just a lack of knowledge (of the site or the content) which causes questions to be inappropriately tagged. The tags themselves are often obscure at best. – cfr May 27 '16 at 2:02
  • @cfr At best, the tag info/wiki should clarify stuff, but often even that is misleading. See for example the info for template and the recent question by peter about what a template is. Improving the quality of tag wikis might be another topic. – Johannes_B May 27 '16 at 6:12
  • Anything @lockstep says I humbly agree :) – percusse Jun 1 '16 at 23:00
  • :-) agreed to that. – Johannes_B Jun 2 '16 at 6:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .