I just found this question through review -- a first post. The question is perfectly clear: the user has a problem and is asking for a solution. So it is not unclear what you're asking
. I cannot say it is too broad
since I do not know how broad it might be because there are no details, and it certainly doesn't seem that broad. I cannot say spam
because it decidedly isn't. It doesn't seem primarily opinion-based
and I do not know of anything it is a duplicate of
. So I go under off-topic
and I find:
WHAT?? Where is missing context
and all the other reasons present on Math SX? Should I leave it open? Should I choose too broad
because an answer as of now would be guesswork? Why do we only have these two specific off-topic reasons? I believe the others at Math are pretty useful:
So where have they gone? Were they ever present here? Why were they removed if they were? Can we have them back?
Update
Joseph points out missing context
is not off-topic
, but still I think we should have that close reason. This way a question without context can be closed as such, so the poster will perhaps be incentivize to add this context.
missing context
should be an independent reason then. I agree that havingmissing context
underoff-topic
seems strange, but it is better than not having it. – MickG Dec 7 '15 at 13:25I'm done
for now, might flag it in the future. – MickG Dec 7 '15 at 13:31