There are around 60 questions that contain makebst
, but no corresponding tag. Should we create one?
1 Answer
(Making this an answer, since it seems to have enough support.)
We already have a custom-bib tag, so really all that is needed is to make makebst a synonym, and perhaps add the custom-bib tag to some of the questions that are missing it. Oddly I don't have enough reputation in the tag to even suggest a synonym (SE works in mysterious ways...) but certainly a moderator could do that.
Just be aware before going on a tagging spree, that adding a tag to a question bumps it to the front page, so it's best to do tagging in small sets over a few days if there are many questions in need of new tags.
-
There don't seem to be many users who are able to create the synonym now, it must be a user with "a total answer score of 5 or more on that tag": tex.stackexchange.com/search?q=%5Bcustom-bib%5D+is%3Aanswer. Perhaps a moderator can do this?– krlmlrSep 6, 2015 at 19:22
-
2
cannot
, but no corresponding tag. Should we create one? There are around 967 containingAMS
(orams
), around 741 containingobsolete
and around 1,373 containingweird
. That is, why this in particular? I'm not sure total number of questions is a good guide to whether a tag is likely to be a useful one or not. (I'm not saying it wouldn't be: just that I don't think the numbers can make the case on their own.)custom-bib
tag, so really all that is needed is to makemakebst
a synonym, and perhaps add thecustom-bib
tag to some of the questions that are missing it. Oddly I don't have enough reputation in the tag to even suggest a synonym (SE works in mysterious ways...) but certainly a moderator could do that.makebst
is a clearly separate program, and hardly someone usesmakebst
and not mean this program. That's not the case withcannot
(which is a standard English word) nor withams
(who maintain lots and lots of separate stuff).makebst
and have not found the custom-bib tag; I would have found it if there was an alias. The figure I gave is just an indicator that there seems to be some interest in this tool. None of these questions seem to be tagged as "custom-bib", although that tag would be appropriate for quite a few of them.