23

I have seen people refer to this site as "TeX.SE" and "TeX.SX". Which is more common? Is one preferred (by appearing in official places)?

I don't think that standardization is necessary: usage will sort it out. Nonetheless, it might be interesting to document the difference, possibly in relation to usage on/for other Stack Exchange sites.

  • 3
    AFAIK we are the only site using SX. – yo' Mar 18 '13 at 18:53
  • 2
    All other sites use SE. Why go against the norm? – becko Mar 19 '13 at 15:40
  • 2
    @becko Because that's how we roll :P. Do we really need a standard on this anyway? – percusse Mar 19 '13 at 16:53
  • @percusse Generally speaking, standardization helps prevent confusion to newcomers. It's simpler to popularize the site under one abbreviation instead of two. That said, this is an informal abbreviation, which is an argument against standardization. – Lover of Structure Mar 19 '13 at 19:56
  • True but still it doesn't matter how you abbreviate that much. Your nickname disallows me to comment Structure and discipline is not needed on this issue. It's a community practice. Time will show the preference. – percusse Mar 19 '13 at 20:02
  • @percusse :-) Actually, I agree with you, to the extent that I have an opinion. I'm really just trying to add arguments, as they come to my mind. I think prescription is good in some places and unnecessary in others. – Lover of Structure Mar 19 '13 at 20:04
20

The 'official' position across the network is to use 'SE', so that is what I use when talking to people on other sites. However, 'SE' is the TLD for Sweden, and 'SX' (or 'sx') fits nicely with 'TeX'. So on the site I and many others use a variation of 'TeX-sx' (TeX-SX, TeX.SX, etc.).

15

This came up tangentially at https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/a/2288/86. I'll copy the last part of my answer from there:

I strongly prefer "TeX-SX" to "TeX.SE" (note the punctuation) and "TeX.SX" is acceptable. I'd rather annoy random other StackExchange users than the Swedes. However, as this has brought it to my attention, I'd rather make the essential details of the site clear right at the outset: that it is about TeX and is hosted on the StackExchange network. Someone visiting the FAQ is more likely to be completely new to the SE network than just visiting from some other site. All of "TeX-SX", "TeX.SX" (is it some new variety of "FX"?), and "TeX.SE" (what has Sweden ever done to you?), are unclear on first sight (and site).

  • This is a good argument, but I would like to supplement this with two thoughts: 1. All-caps "SE" is less likely to be mistaken for being an abbreviation for "Sweden" than lowercase "se", which appears in domain names. 2. Acronym clash is extremely common. Unless there is an obvious or bothersome way of misunderstanding an acronym, such clash avoidance may be a futile effort. – Lover of Structure Mar 19 '13 at 20:00
8

In my view, TeX.SE corresponds to TeX.StackExchange(Abbreviation) whereas TeX.SX corresponds to TeX.StackeXchange(Phonetically stressed X) but both are good as long as its properly cited as asked in your meta Q and credits attributed.

  • This answer should be accepted! – manooooh Feb 25 at 7:36
6

I've been using (and seeing other people use) »TeX.SE« for about two years now, and it never made me think of Sweden, until you mentioned it -- which is probably because domain names are hardly ever spelt in uppercase (and which is why I think it's important to keep spelling it that way). Both »TeX.SE« and »TeX.SX«, however, make me think of straight edge hardcore punk, but that's okay. I prefer ».SE« because it's more down-to-earth than ».SX« which I find too fancy, or to 1990s, probably because of that »FX« association:

"TeX.SX" (is it some new variety of "FX"?)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .