While looking at the (IMO very good) question Storing and retrieving data in tuc file, I think that the luatex tag is inappropriate, it should be mkiv or contextmarkiv or something similar. This is because this question does not apply on the (here default) LaTeX format with LuaTeX. A specific mkiv tag would be much better for future searches.
Although I'm a bit skeptical that the tags will get used, it's worth a try. I propose creating mk{ii|iv} suffixes for the context tag: i.e. context-mkii and context-mkiv along with very clear tag wikis to distinguish them rather than simple [mkii] and [mkiv] tags, which will not show up in the tag list when people try to add a context tag.
I just saw that Patrick Gundlach has added the new context-mkiv tag to the first two questions, while at the same time removing luatex and context. I'm not familiar with any of these tag subjects, and it may well be that questions about context-mkiv may be of no interest to the "general luaTeX" user, but I suggest that questions about MkIV should also feature the general context tag. For now, I re-added this tag to the two questions.
-
"..but I suggest that questions about MkIV should also feature the general context tag" - would you mind to elaborate why you suggest to add the tag? – topskip Apr 19 '12 at 5:48
-
1@Patrick Because many MkIV questions may also be of interest for general ConTeXt users. – lockstep Apr 19 '12 at 6:36
-
You're right. I'll keep the {context} tag in the next retag session :) – topskip Apr 21 '12 at 14:13
[luatex] -[context]or[luatex] [context](depending on the case) cover this? (I'm not against the idea, I'm just making sure I understand the concept properly.) – Joseph Wright♦ Apr 16 '12 at 12:27[luatex] -[context]would almost do the same job, but not quite:[luatex]and[context]in a question could mean that the OP is happy with either a LuaTeX or a ConTeXt question (but unlikely), but[mkiv]would make things clearer. – topskip Apr 16 '12 at 12:36[luatex]is a synonym for[lualatex](and[pdftex]is a synonym for[pdflatex]. Shouldn't[luatex]refer to the engine and[lualatex]and[mkiv]refer to the macro formats. Similarly,[pdftex]should refer to the engine and[pdflatex]and[mkii]to the macro format. – Aditya Apr 17 '12 at 5:32[markiv]tag or equivalent, even if it it useful for searching, is unlikely to be added by users. – Alan Munn Apr 17 '12 at 14:33[mkiv]tag? – Alan Munn Apr 17 '12 at 15:48[context]and[lua]or[context]and[luatex], so the current situation leads to confusion whether the OP should use[luatex]or[lua]together with[context]- a[mkiv]tag would have helped with these questions. A[mkii]tag could express that the OP is interested in a pdfTeX/XeTeX ConTeXt solution, a[mkiv]tag shows that a LuaTeX based ConTeXt solution would be fine, both tags could represent a "choice does not matter" question. – topskip Apr 17 '12 at 16:00mk{ii|iv}suffixes for the[context]tag: i.e.[context-mkii]and[context-mkiv]along with very clear tag wikis to distinguish them rather than simple[mkii]and[mkiv]tags, which will not show up in the tag list when people try to add a[context]tag. – Alan Munn Apr 18 '12 at 0:23dbawith the oracle tag. – Reinstate Monica - M. Schröder Jan 10 '13 at 12:37