The following question:
was just closed as a duplicate of this question:
Automatically convert quotations in the form of "abc" to become ``abc"
But the accepted answer here uses the quotes
package, whereas I think the best answer should be to use the csquotes
package. So by linking the closed question to the older question we encourage a less than ideal answer.
This doesn't seem like a very good thing.
Note that I'm concerned about the general issue of choosing duplicates, not just this specific instance. The issue is that when we choose duplicates, should we take into consideration the validity of the accepted answer of the linked question. Unlike the original acceptance (which we have no control over) linking to the duplicate is something we do have control over.