19

As we all know extra tags need a lot of work, especially re-tagging of old posts. However there are a number of questions relating to the LaTeX kernel that do not fit in with the existing categories. In most cases LaTeX macros starting with an \@ would fit into this category. They are not TeX-core and do not fit exactly with the macro category. What do you think?

16

I can see the potential usefulness of a tag. However, it should only be introduced together with a tag wiki excerpt that clearly states that the tag is not meant for general questions about LaTeX. (As a working definition of what is about, I suggest "anything that requires delving into source2e", e.g., my question What exactly does \@doendpe do? would fit.)

EDIT: Some questions may have to be retagged from to , e.g., Documentation reference for LaTeX internal commands?

EDIT 2: I added the tag to the first three questions and also created a tag wiki excerpt.

15

I'm in favor of such a tag. We just have to be careful that new users don't use it a general LaTeX tag.

Suggestions so far for the tag name where latex-core or latex-kernel. Actually I find kernel now much better because that is the term also used by the original LaTeX2e team, at least it is part of some kernel macro names.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .