The tags and are used interchangeably. So I think they can be merged (I'd merge into and rename that to ).

| |
  • One is a package, the other encompasses a much larger set of things. I forget what the standard on packages tags is, but if we have tags for other packages, then it makes sense to have a tag for ifthen. Otherwise, this seems like a good merge. – TH. Mar 31 '11 at 3:53
  • @TH. If i haven't miscounted, 2 out of the 19 {ifthen} questions are actually about the package. I think people use both tags as concept tags. – Caramdir Mar 31 '11 at 4:01
  • I'm for merging. If necessary, we could create an {ifthen-package} tag. – lockstep Mar 31 '11 at 5:46
  • @lockstep, @Caramdir: Why not just retag the 17? I'm pretty sure none of the other package tags have a -package suffix (although, it wouldn't be horrible if they did). – TH. Mar 31 '11 at 7:45
  • TH.: This would flood the starting page with old questions. (Been there, done that. ;-)) – lockstep Mar 31 '11 at 7:53

As it's meaningful and there are some votes, I

Perhaps somebody would create or suggest a tag wiki for .

| |

The tag was resurrected for a question specifically about the ifthen package. At the moment, the tag features four questions.

| |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .